Skip to content

Grammar Girl: Which Versus That

September 20, 2008

If you haven’t discovered Grammar Girl, I HIGHLY recommend putting this podcast in your iTunes or in your RSS feed. Talk about valuable tips for the writer!

by Grammar Girl

If you’re confused about that versus which, don’t feel bad. It’s one of the most common topics people ask me about. I used to work as a technical writer, and I’d often edit documents in which people used the wrong word. More than once, I’d put in the right word, only to have clients change a perfectly fine that to a which and send it back to me. In fact, having a client try to overrule my correction of a which to a that was one of the things that pushed me over the edge and made me start the Grammar Girl podcast.

Here’s the deal: some people will argue that the rules are more complex and flexible than this, but I like to make things as simple as possible, so I say that you use that before a restrictive clause and which before everything else.

Restrictive Clause–That

A restrictive clause is just part of a sentence that you can’t get rid of because it specifically restricts some other part of the sentence. Here’s an example:

Gems that sparkle often elicit forgiveness.

The words that sparkle restrict the kind of gems you’re talking about. Without them, the meaning of the sentence would change. Without them, you’d be saying that all gems elicit forgiveness, not just the gems that sparkle. (And note that you don’t need commas around the words that sparkle.)

Nonrestrictive Clause–Which

A nonrestrictive clause is something that can be left off without changing the meaning of the sentence. You can think of a nonrestrictive clause as simply additional information. Here’s an example:

Diamonds, which are expensive, often elicit forgiveness.

Alas, in Grammar Girl’s world, diamonds are always expensive, so leaving out the words which are expensive doesn’t change the meaning of the sentence. (Also note that the phrase is surrounded by commas. Nonrestrictive clauses are usually surrounded by, or preceded by, commas.) Here’s another example:
There was an earthquake in China, which is bad news.


If you leave off the clause that says which is bad news, it doesn’t change the meaning of the rest of the sentence.

A quick and dirty tip (with apologies to Wiccans and Hermione Granger) is to remember that you can throw out the “whiches” and no harm will be done. You use which in nonrestrictive clauses, and if you eliminate a nonrestrictive clause, the meaning of the remaining part of the sentence will be the same as it was before.

Read the rest of the article here.

And did you know Grammar Girl has a book?

AND, did you know there are only 10 days left before you can sign up for the next NaNoWrMo challenge?

  1. September 21, 2008 10:10 pm

    Actually, for the next 10 days, you can’t sign up for NaNoWriMo — they’ve locked down the system to get it ready for this year’s NaNo. Sign-ups start again October 1, and you’ve got the whole month before NaNoWriMo starts on November 1.

  2. September 22, 2008 10:54 am

    Hence the reason I wrote “before you can sign up.” 😀

    You’re right, though. I didn’t word that very well. Thank you for explaining.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: